Tree swallow pests
-
Steve G
- Posts: 4
- Joined: Mon May 05, 2014 4:22 pm
- Location: WI/Princeton
- Martin Colony History: 2017 first nesting pair
2016 visitors
2015 many visitors
2014 0
2013 0
I am in year 5 of trying to get PM. Goods news is...I have a pair that are nesting and another pair looking. However the TS are going crazy trying to nest in the PM house. I only have 4 apartments open, just trying to limit TS erridication. My question, should I continue to chase the TS out? I have a TS house close to the PM house and the TS have done a good job keeping other TS out of the PM house, but now not so good.
-
Mhoover
- Posts: 213
- Joined: Wed May 30, 2012 10:30 am
- Location: Indiana/Monticello - White County
- Martin Colony History: Started with 2 pair in 2014 - 7 eggs -7 fledged
Keep removing the tree swallow nests so that they will be forced to accept the cavity that you have for them. Do not let them get attached to your PM housing.
2017-5 pair
2016-4 pair- 18 hatched-18 fledged
2015-1 pair -Both ASY- 6 eggs-5 fledged
2014-2 pair- 1 ASY-M/SY-F-1 ASY pair - 7 eggs-7 fledged
PMCA Member
2016-4 pair- 18 hatched-18 fledged
2015-1 pair -Both ASY- 6 eggs-5 fledged
2014-2 pair- 1 ASY-M/SY-F-1 ASY pair - 7 eggs-7 fledged
PMCA Member
-
randyM
- Posts: 254
- Joined: Thu Jun 18, 2015 2:30 pm
- Location: Long Lake SD
- Martin Colony History: * 2016 - 1 pair (ASYM + SYF) 2/3 eggs hatched 2 young fledged.
* 2017 - 4 pairs, 16/17 eggs hatched, 16 fledged, 16 banded - 2 banded SY returned in 2018 (12.5%)
* 2018 - 10 pairs, 46/52 eggs hatched, 45 fledged, 29 young banded - 3 banded SY returned in 2019 (10.3%)
*2019 - 32 pairs, 145/160 eggs hatched, 139 fledged - 87 young banded - 12 banded SY returned in 2020 (13.8%).
* 2020 - 35 pairs, 180/199 eggs hatched, 178 fledged - 150 young banded & 42 SY returned (28.0%)
* 2021 - 89 pairs, 363/446 eggs hatched, 355 fledged - 150 young banded & 19 SY returned (12.7%)
*2022 - 116 pairs, 495/579 eggs hatched, 471 fledged - 150 young banded & 27 SY returned (18.0%)
*2023 - 160 pairs, 708/828 eggs hatched, 572 fledged - 150 young banded & 38 SY returned (25.3%)
*2024 - 235 pairs, 950/1153 eggs hatched, 865 fledged - 100 young banded & 18 SY returned (18.0%)
*2025 - 200 pairs, 795/953 eggs hatched, 739 fledged - 200 young banded
How many TS nest boxes do you have on your property and how many TS pairs are presenting you with this problem? If you only have one TS nest box, perhaps you could try offering another option to them by putting up another next box in your yard on the other side of your martin housing - opposite from your other TS nest box to hopefully attract this persistent TS pair away from your PM housing. Do the TS pair and your martin pairs squabble frequently? I have 50 TS pairs nesting on my property (some occupied TS houses within 60 feet of other occupied TS houses), including one for the first time nesting in a super gourd hanging directly beneath a wooden martin house. There is an ASY PM pair nesting in a compartment less than 2 feet from the TS. The TS laid her 7 eggs first and is half way through incubation, while the PM is just laying now and is on her 3rd egg as of today. The TS pair and PM pair squabble on very rare occasions, but the encounters are less frequent, less intense, and a shorter duration than when the ASY male PM squabbles with SY PM males. TS and PM can "peacefully" nest close together, but this arrangement generally only works after a PM colony is established. I had 1 PM pair successfully nest last year among 40 nesting TS pairs, and this year so far I have 50 nesting TS pairs and 4 nesting PM pairs (plus 3 SY males). I hope you find a solution to your TS situation so you can enjoy both species during the nesting season, as I do. Good luck!
-
Steve G
- Posts: 4
- Joined: Mon May 05, 2014 4:22 pm
- Location: WI/Princeton
- Martin Colony History: 2017 first nesting pair
2016 visitors
2015 many visitors
2014 0
2013 0
Thank you so much for your reply.
I have over ten blue bird houses that the TS normally use on my property. There seems to be a couple pair of TS that are trying to nest in my T14. The PM and TS seem to get along OK, I am just wanting to make sure having TS nesting in the T 14 won't create problems with the nesting pair or the one pair looking. I have two gourds below my T14 and the nesting PM are in one of the gourds. If I evict the TS do I just close off the apartment and reopen another???
I have over ten blue bird houses that the TS normally use on my property. There seems to be a couple pair of TS that are trying to nest in my T14. The PM and TS seem to get along OK, I am just wanting to make sure having TS nesting in the T 14 won't create problems with the nesting pair or the one pair looking. I have two gourds below my T14 and the nesting PM are in one of the gourds. If I evict the TS do I just close off the apartment and reopen another???
-
flyin-lowe
- Posts: 3788
- Joined: Wed Mar 29, 2006 8:49 am
- Location: Indiana/Henry Co.
How far away is the closest TS cavity to your martin set up? If it is too far away the TS using it will not protect the area that contains the PM housing from other TS.
I am guessing your area is like mine, I could put up 10,000 TS houses and I would have 10,001 pair of TS. I have used Dan Drews protocol in the past and it is tough but it works. This year I tried something different. I left all the housing closed up and had TS all over my martin housing all spring. I did not have any TS housing open near my martin housing so they spent all spring on my martin housing trying to get in. Once I had a few SY martins show up I set a single gourd about 30 feet from my martin housing. The TS flocked to it fighting over it and paid so much attention to that, that they didn't focus on the open cavities of the martin housing. So far it worked. Once you get some ASY martins returning they will not be run off by the TS but they can run off SY martins who don't have strong site fidelity.
I am guessing your area is like mine, I could put up 10,000 TS houses and I would have 10,001 pair of TS. I have used Dan Drews protocol in the past and it is tough but it works. This year I tried something different. I left all the housing closed up and had TS all over my martin housing all spring. I did not have any TS housing open near my martin housing so they spent all spring on my martin housing trying to get in. Once I had a few SY martins show up I set a single gourd about 30 feet from my martin housing. The TS flocked to it fighting over it and paid so much attention to that, that they didn't focus on the open cavities of the martin housing. So far it worked. Once you get some ASY martins returning they will not be run off by the TS but they can run off SY martins who don't have strong site fidelity.
2026 HOSP 26
2025 62 pair HOSP 20
2024 60 pair, HOSP 44
2023 60+ pair, HOSP 8
2022 60 nests with 262 eggs, HOSP 14
2021 62 pair, HOSP 9
2020 42 nest, HOSP 8
2019- 31 pair
2018- 15 pair 49 fledged
2017 3 SY pair, 12 eggs , fledged 10. 4 additional lone SY's
2016 1 pair fledged 4
2015 Visitors
2014 Visitors
2013 Moved 6 miles, 1 pair fledged 2.
2012 30 pair fledged 100.
2011 12 pair 43 fledged.
2010 5 pair 14 fledged.
2025 62 pair HOSP 20
2024 60 pair, HOSP 44
2023 60+ pair, HOSP 8
2022 60 nests with 262 eggs, HOSP 14
2021 62 pair, HOSP 9
2020 42 nest, HOSP 8
2019- 31 pair
2018- 15 pair 49 fledged
2017 3 SY pair, 12 eggs , fledged 10. 4 additional lone SY's
2016 1 pair fledged 4
2015 Visitors
2014 Visitors
2013 Moved 6 miles, 1 pair fledged 2.
2012 30 pair fledged 100.
2011 12 pair 43 fledged.
2010 5 pair 14 fledged.
-
Ed Svetich-WI
- Posts: 815
- Joined: Tue Jan 13, 2004 10:05 pm
- Location: Brooks, Wi (McGinnis Lake)
- Martin Colony History: 24 Super and Excluder Gourds on two gourd racks, all SREH. Full occupancy. My philosophy is to maximize fledge % with existing cavities rather than adding gourds to grow colony, thus providing opportunities for new colony expansion. Fledge over 100 nestlings yearly from 24 gourds. Band nestlings in cooperation with state university. 2019 Adendum: Reduced colony size to 12 gourds to focus on more intensive management regimen.
I am not a tree swallow advocate. They are aggressive nest site competitors of any cavity nesting birds. They outproduce blue birds, prothontory warblers and may be responsible for many failed attempts to establish martin colonies. I know they have many fervent advocates, but studies have shown that eager craftsmen have placed far too many bird houses for blue birds with the result that tree swallows have proliferated.
In your case, I agree that you should continue to discourage tree swallows from nesting in your martin housing and force them to seek other nest opportunities. I have three houses occupied by tree swallows this year. After removing half of my blue bird houses two years ago, I actually had two houses occupied by blue birds. I again have two pair of blue birds nesting this year. Tree swallows are in no need of going out of existence as blue birds once were.
I fully embrace the Drew Protocol or the tree swalow emergency protocol. It worked for me years ago, but I encourage moderation in the placement of additional blue bird housing. If you have multiple acres, you can space them judiciously as recomended(100 yards apart), but don't go overboard.
Good luck with your martins.
Ed
In your case, I agree that you should continue to discourage tree swallows from nesting in your martin housing and force them to seek other nest opportunities. I have three houses occupied by tree swallows this year. After removing half of my blue bird houses two years ago, I actually had two houses occupied by blue birds. I again have two pair of blue birds nesting this year. Tree swallows are in no need of going out of existence as blue birds once were.
I fully embrace the Drew Protocol or the tree swalow emergency protocol. It worked for me years ago, but I encourage moderation in the placement of additional blue bird housing. If you have multiple acres, you can space them judiciously as recomended(100 yards apart), but don't go overboard.
Good luck with your martins.
Ed
-
handyman315
- Posts: 300
- Joined: Thu May 12, 2016 11:03 am
- Location: SW Ohio
- Martin Colony History: Colony established May 20, 2017 after three unsuccessful years. Persistent and aggressive Tree Swallows plagued the site, but beyond learning - and practicing - to control them, was the return in 2017 of a 2016-SY-M previously unable to find a mate. As a handsome ASY-M, he brought along two females and a swagger that soon put the Tree Swallow issue to rest. As the anchor pair, he and his mate hatched all six of their eggs into fat and healthy babies into what settled in to be a three-pair, flourishing new colony with up to 11 birds total, including 3 SY-M trouble makers.
Dead-on been my experience, i.e., TSs were at the root of my three-year failure to establish a NEW (first-time) PM colony . . . well, I was the problem because I was not implementing the Drew protocol exactly . . . just couldn't believe that bringing the TS gourd CLOSER would work, but it did.flyin-lowe wrote:How far away is the closest TS cavity to your martin set up? If it is too far away the TS using it will not protect the area that contains the PM housing from other TS.
I am guessing your area is like mine, I could put up 10,000 TS houses and I would have 10,001 pair of TS. I have used Dan Drews protocol in the past and it is tough but it works. This year I tried something different. I left all the housing closed up and had TS all over my martin housing all spring. I did not have any TS housing open near my martin housing so they spent all spring on my martin housing trying to get in. Once I had a few SY martins show up I set a single gourd about 30 feet from my martin housing. The TS flocked to it fighting over it and paid so much attention to that, that they didn't focus on the open cavities of the martin housing. So far it worked. Once you get some ASY martins returning they will not be run off by the TS but they can run off SY martins who don't have strong site fidelity.
Even with a new colony well underway, e.g., ten eggs in three nests and more nesting underway, there are STILL some problems. Even though smaller than PMs, those TSs are mighty little fighters, example . . . just yesterday a SY-M was looking in the TS shepherd hook gourd, now with 6 or 7 babies (yeah, he was looking for trouble and shouldn't have been there) . . . a TS attacked him in less than 15 seconds by swooping in, knocking the PM to the ground, and never letting go . . . I walked out there and was less than three feet away before the TS finally let go. The PM flew away with no apparent injury, but it looked bad. Was the TS choking him? Biting him? Piercing him with claws? All of the above?
Most important thing for me was that the SYs were just too timid to fight off the TSs - even though the TSs were already established in a shepherd hook gourd. When a returning 2016 SY-M returned as a 2017 ASY-M and I kept most of my housing closed MUCH longer did the new colony take hold. At the very least it has been a balancing act, and there is every indication to believe that some troubles will continue.
BTW, TSs are adorable little flyers in their own right, just wish these swallow cousins could get along a little better.
Good luck!
2023-42 Nests, 197 Eggs/Babies
2022-48 Nests Fledged 203
2021-43 Nests Fledged 185
2020-31 Nests Fledged 133, three early deaths due to cold & rain
2019-19 Nests Fledged 84
2018-11 Nests Fledged 48, ASY-M Arrived April 6, Despite Snow & Cold, Joined Soon by Mate & Two Adult Pairs
2017-3 Nests Fledged 13, FIRST-YEAR LANDLORD! Resident SY-M from 2016 Returned (as ASY-M) on May 20. At Least 11 Adult Residents
2016 Late-Arriving SYs, Resident Lone SY-M
2015-14 Many Visits
2022-48 Nests Fledged 203
2021-43 Nests Fledged 185
2020-31 Nests Fledged 133, three early deaths due to cold & rain
2019-19 Nests Fledged 84
2018-11 Nests Fledged 48, ASY-M Arrived April 6, Despite Snow & Cold, Joined Soon by Mate & Two Adult Pairs
2017-3 Nests Fledged 13, FIRST-YEAR LANDLORD! Resident SY-M from 2016 Returned (as ASY-M) on May 20. At Least 11 Adult Residents
2016 Late-Arriving SYs, Resident Lone SY-M
2015-14 Many Visits
-
~Ray~Gingerich
- Posts: 2122
- Joined: Mon Jan 05, 2004 10:24 pm
- Location: Delaware/Dover
IF you don't have an established purple martin colony it's best to keep the tree swallows out of your colony completely no matter what distance. The tree swallows will harrass any martin that comes in...there are plenty of sites to choose from,the martins will look elsewhere rather than put up with the hassle of dealing with them.
~Ray~ Gingerich
1999 1pair, 2006 2 pair, 2008 2 pair,
2009 23 pair, 2010 39 pair, 2011 67 pair,
2012 115 pair, 2013 160 pair,
2014 152 pair, 2015 174 pair, 2016 178 pair
2017 187 pair, 2018 200 pair, 2019 171pair
2020 233 pair
1999 1pair, 2006 2 pair, 2008 2 pair,
2009 23 pair, 2010 39 pair, 2011 67 pair,
2012 115 pair, 2013 160 pair,
2014 152 pair, 2015 174 pair, 2016 178 pair
2017 187 pair, 2018 200 pair, 2019 171pair
2020 233 pair
-
handyman315
- Posts: 300
- Joined: Thu May 12, 2016 11:03 am
- Location: SW Ohio
- Martin Colony History: Colony established May 20, 2017 after three unsuccessful years. Persistent and aggressive Tree Swallows plagued the site, but beyond learning - and practicing - to control them, was the return in 2017 of a 2016-SY-M previously unable to find a mate. As a handsome ASY-M, he brought along two females and a swagger that soon put the Tree Swallow issue to rest. As the anchor pair, he and his mate hatched all six of their eggs into fat and healthy babies into what settled in to be a three-pair, flourishing new colony with up to 11 birds total, including 3 SY-M trouble makers.
Ray, you make a great point, but how? I couldn't get rid of the TSs. Kept my housing closed until the PMs showed up, opened the housing, BANG! the TSs were back . . . and of course, chasing the PMs!~Ray~Gingerich wrote:IF you don't have an established purple martin colony it's best to keep the tree swallows out of your colony completely no matter what distance. The tree swallows will harrass any martin that comes in...there are plenty of sites to choose from,the martins will look elsewhere rather than put up with the hassle of dealing with them.
2023-42 Nests, 197 Eggs/Babies
2022-48 Nests Fledged 203
2021-43 Nests Fledged 185
2020-31 Nests Fledged 133, three early deaths due to cold & rain
2019-19 Nests Fledged 84
2018-11 Nests Fledged 48, ASY-M Arrived April 6, Despite Snow & Cold, Joined Soon by Mate & Two Adult Pairs
2017-3 Nests Fledged 13, FIRST-YEAR LANDLORD! Resident SY-M from 2016 Returned (as ASY-M) on May 20. At Least 11 Adult Residents
2016 Late-Arriving SYs, Resident Lone SY-M
2015-14 Many Visits
2022-48 Nests Fledged 203
2021-43 Nests Fledged 185
2020-31 Nests Fledged 133, three early deaths due to cold & rain
2019-19 Nests Fledged 84
2018-11 Nests Fledged 48, ASY-M Arrived April 6, Despite Snow & Cold, Joined Soon by Mate & Two Adult Pairs
2017-3 Nests Fledged 13, FIRST-YEAR LANDLORD! Resident SY-M from 2016 Returned (as ASY-M) on May 20. At Least 11 Adult Residents
2016 Late-Arriving SYs, Resident Lone SY-M
2015-14 Many Visits
-
Tengai
- Posts: 68
- Joined: Tue Apr 04, 2017 9:36 am
- Location: Townsend, DE
- Martin Colony History: 2017 first year
I'm brand new to the purple Martin thing.
I did manage a 50 nest box bluebird trail years ago in nj. Started with my sons Cub Scout project and maintained it for many years had bb ts and other native birds over the years. We Moved last June to a house with 4 1/2 acres with existing bird houses placed too close for bb but far enough spacing for ts to overrun the property
My guess going on for years
I paired and space boxes 100 yards apart put up a Martin rig 30 feet from 1 pair which has bb in one and ts the other. I've had minimal interference from either with the martins and now have eggs in at least 5-6 cavities with more on the way.
I guess what I'm saying is it's possible to get martins with a high ts population
The ts and bb were building laying eggs before the martins arrived
I did manage a 50 nest box bluebird trail years ago in nj. Started with my sons Cub Scout project and maintained it for many years had bb ts and other native birds over the years. We Moved last June to a house with 4 1/2 acres with existing bird houses placed too close for bb but far enough spacing for ts to overrun the property
My guess going on for years
I paired and space boxes 100 yards apart put up a Martin rig 30 feet from 1 pair which has bb in one and ts the other. I've had minimal interference from either with the martins and now have eggs in at least 5-6 cavities with more on the way.
I guess what I'm saying is it's possible to get martins with a high ts population
The ts and bb were building laying eggs before the martins arrived
Phil
Townsend DE
Townsend DE
Great mentioning that Ed.Ed Svetich-WI wrote:I fully embrace the Drew Protocol or the tree swalow emergency protocol. It worked for me years ago, but I encourage moderation in the placement of additional blue bird housing. If you have multiple acres, you can space them judiciously as recomended(100 yards apart), but don't go overboard.
Dan Drew's protocol has definitely helped a lot of folks.
For those that may be unfamiliar, here it is:
https://www.purplemartin.org/uploads/me ... cy-377.pdf
-
Steve G
- Posts: 4
- Joined: Mon May 05, 2014 4:22 pm
- Location: WI/Princeton
- Martin Colony History: 2017 first nesting pair
2016 visitors
2015 many visitors
2014 0
2013 0
I really appreciate all your help with this. After 5 years of trying and now finally one nesting pair, I don't want this opportunity lost. I had the Dan drew protocol in place and it worked great until a couple days ago. I think the TS babies have left or the other TS nest have also left. I am out of town for a couple days, when I get back I am getting rid of these pests.
-
randyM
- Posts: 254
- Joined: Thu Jun 18, 2015 2:30 pm
- Location: Long Lake SD
- Martin Colony History: * 2016 - 1 pair (ASYM + SYF) 2/3 eggs hatched 2 young fledged.
* 2017 - 4 pairs, 16/17 eggs hatched, 16 fledged, 16 banded - 2 banded SY returned in 2018 (12.5%)
* 2018 - 10 pairs, 46/52 eggs hatched, 45 fledged, 29 young banded - 3 banded SY returned in 2019 (10.3%)
*2019 - 32 pairs, 145/160 eggs hatched, 139 fledged - 87 young banded - 12 banded SY returned in 2020 (13.8%).
* 2020 - 35 pairs, 180/199 eggs hatched, 178 fledged - 150 young banded & 42 SY returned (28.0%)
* 2021 - 89 pairs, 363/446 eggs hatched, 355 fledged - 150 young banded & 19 SY returned (12.7%)
*2022 - 116 pairs, 495/579 eggs hatched, 471 fledged - 150 young banded & 27 SY returned (18.0%)
*2023 - 160 pairs, 708/828 eggs hatched, 572 fledged - 150 young banded & 38 SY returned (25.3%)
*2024 - 235 pairs, 950/1153 eggs hatched, 865 fledged - 100 young banded & 18 SY returned (18.0%)
*2025 - 200 pairs, 795/953 eggs hatched, 739 fledged - 200 young banded
Steve, what is your plan to "get rid of or eradicate these TS pests"? It would be good if you can entice the TS pair to nest closer to the ground in a single unit, but other than blocking all unoccupied nest cavities in your PM housing and putting up such an alternative nest box (which may or may not work), I'm not sure what other legal options you have. I'm not suggesting that you have ultimate plans to truly "eradicate" the problem TS pair, as you stated earlier, as they are protected by Federal law in the Migratory Bird Treaty Act of 1918 which states migratory birds such as TS (and hundreds of other bird species) cannot be harmed or killed, nor can their nests (especially those with eggs) be destroyed...doing so can result in fines and possible jail time. House sparrows and starlings are not protected by this treaty as they are invasive non-native, mostly non-migratory species. Does your nesting PM pair have eggs and, if so, are they incubating yet? Has your other PM pair claimed a cavity for nesting yet? If you temporarily block all cavities except 1 or 2 in your PM housing, it is possible the TS will try to claim the 1 or 2 cavities you leave open and run off your second PM pair. If the TS and PM seem to be getting along and have called a truce, perhaps it may be best to let them co-exist in the same housing this year, given at least one PM pair apparently has already claimed residency in your housing. The Drew Protocol does emphasize the need to closely follow the listed protocol "if you've been unsuccessful in attracting PM to your site", and it appears you already have PMs using your site, so the protocol does not necessarily need to be implemented in this situation, especially if your PM pair has eggs and has begun incubation and the PM and TS seem to get along for the most part. I know from personal experience the agony of patiently waiting years for a PM colony to get established on your personal site and understand you concerns of possibly losing your infant colony. The good news for you is that some PMs like your site and are nesting, and that's the biggest hurdle to overcome in getting a new colony established. Best of luck to you!
-
Steve G
- Posts: 4
- Joined: Mon May 05, 2014 4:22 pm
- Location: WI/Princeton
- Martin Colony History: 2017 first nesting pair
2016 visitors
2015 many visitors
2014 0
2013 0
Thanks Randy,
I was planning on removing any evidence of TS in the nests, like feathers, etc. and give it a full blitz effort to move them into other houses. However I like your thought...if they seem to be getting along let them cohabitation this year. I will keep you posted
I was planning on removing any evidence of TS in the nests, like feathers, etc. and give it a full blitz effort to move them into other houses. However I like your thought...if they seem to be getting along let them cohabitation this year. I will keep you posted
-
randyM
- Posts: 254
- Joined: Thu Jun 18, 2015 2:30 pm
- Location: Long Lake SD
- Martin Colony History: * 2016 - 1 pair (ASYM + SYF) 2/3 eggs hatched 2 young fledged.
* 2017 - 4 pairs, 16/17 eggs hatched, 16 fledged, 16 banded - 2 banded SY returned in 2018 (12.5%)
* 2018 - 10 pairs, 46/52 eggs hatched, 45 fledged, 29 young banded - 3 banded SY returned in 2019 (10.3%)
*2019 - 32 pairs, 145/160 eggs hatched, 139 fledged - 87 young banded - 12 banded SY returned in 2020 (13.8%).
* 2020 - 35 pairs, 180/199 eggs hatched, 178 fledged - 150 young banded & 42 SY returned (28.0%)
* 2021 - 89 pairs, 363/446 eggs hatched, 355 fledged - 150 young banded & 19 SY returned (12.7%)
*2022 - 116 pairs, 495/579 eggs hatched, 471 fledged - 150 young banded & 27 SY returned (18.0%)
*2023 - 160 pairs, 708/828 eggs hatched, 572 fledged - 150 young banded & 38 SY returned (25.3%)
*2024 - 235 pairs, 950/1153 eggs hatched, 865 fledged - 100 young banded & 18 SY returned (18.0%)
*2025 - 200 pairs, 795/953 eggs hatched, 739 fledged - 200 young banded
Kim, do you have any PM decoys out in your colony and do you play the martin dawn song or daytime chatter CD? For years I watched TS chase most of the martins that visited my site. After I placed a half dozen decoys around my PM housing (some very close to the closest TS nest box)and started playing the PM CDs each day, the TS seemed to be less aggressive towards any PM that came to visit my site. I assume the TS began to accept the sight and sound of PM (although artificial) being in the colony each day, so when a real PM came to visit my site the TS would be less aggressive and somewhat passive towards PM because they were used to seeing and hearing PMs every day. I truly believe placing PM decoys and playing the CDs each day helped get my PM colony started in a area with a high density of nesting TS.
Yes to both questions. At least there not quite as aggressive as the bb which are not a problem at the moment. Have a sy female that has been here since Monday. She had brought in several males but they don't hang around long
Kim W.
